Forty-two

guilty party: Ashraf on 1/31/2009

Today is the final day of January and my 4th post of this month. I wanted to post something about my trip to Penang but sorting and uploading the pics became too much of a hassle so I got lazy. Instead I will talk about general nonsense principally writen in a non-coherent way. In short, the same crap you'll see if you click on the older posts button.

Yesterday I saw Michael Bay's Transformers. AGAIN!

Since it's relase in the summer two years ago I have witnessed many, many, many men drool over the lead actress, Megan Fox. So the point of my entry today is to shine a beacon of light upon this blatant barbaranism. A truth that has eluded these heathens for far too long.

You see readers, the truth is that the lesser known actor Rachael Taylor is far supperior to Megan Fox.

Now I know this truth may be a bit extreme to some. So extreme in fact that a few may be compeled to chalenge it. So I shall now explain why you fools are clearly wrong.

Reason #1



'nuff said

Reason #2

Maggie (Rachael Taylor's character) plays an analyst whereas Mickaela (Megan Fox) is just an average High School student and "an evil jock-concubine". So by taking into acount this simple funtion it is clear that Maggie is superior.

Reason #3


Be-awesome Tasmanian accent.


Conclusion?


Optimus prime kicks all the humanoid characters asses

3 Verbal Bashing/s:

Comment by dayanaazhar:) on January 31, 2009 at 4:16 PM

well we have to face the fact, that people like Megan Fox because of her sensual assets, the sexy-typo look. u know these days, that all what counts..

 
Comment by Ashraf on February 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Yeah I know. But this is my blog ergo my opinion. So the only facts I have to face are mine. And I rule that science IS sexy!

 
Comment by Nadia on February 1, 2009 at 1:03 PM

this blog post makes total sense. ohh i see an epiphany coming